TL;DR
The Supreme Court affirmed that a person can be convicted of bigamy even if their second marriage is later declared void. The crime of bigamy is committed the moment a person enters into a second marriage while still legally married to another. This means that a subsequent declaration of nullity of the second marriage does not erase the crime. This decision reinforces the importance of respecting the sanctity of marriage and ensuring that individuals do not enter into subsequent marriages without legally dissolving their first.
Double Rings, Double Trouble: Can a Void Marriage Save You from a Bigamy Charge?
This case revolves around James Walter P. Capili, who was charged with bigamy for marrying Shirley Tismo-Capili while still legally married to Karla Y. Medina-Capili. The twist? After the bigamy charge was filed, a court declared James’s second marriage to Shirley null and void. The question before the Supreme Court was whether this declaration of nullity could absolve James of the bigamy charge. The legal issue is whether a subsequent declaration of nullity of a second marriage, due to its bigamous nature, is a valid defense against a charge of bigamy.
The Revised Penal Code defines bigamy in Article 349:
Art. 349. Bigamy. – The penalty of prision mayor shall be imposed upon any person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared presumptively dead by means of a judgment rendered in the proper proceedings.
The elements of bigamy are: (1) a legally valid first marriage; (2) the first marriage is undissolved; (3) the accused contracts a second marriage; and (4) the second marriage possesses all the essential requisites for validity. In this case, all the elements were present when James married Shirley while his marriage to Karla was still valid. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) initially dismissed the bigamy case, but the Court of Appeals (CA) reversed this decision, leading to the Supreme Court review.
The Supreme Court sided with the Court of Appeals, emphasizing that the crime of bigamy is consummated at the moment the second marriage is celebrated while the first marriage is still valid. The Court cited Jarillo v. People, which explicitly states that the subsequent judicial declaration of nullity of the first marriage is immaterial because the crime had already been committed. The Court further explained that allowing a subsequent declaration of nullity to excuse bigamy would create a loophole, encouraging accused individuals to simply seek annulment of their prior marriage to evade prosecution.
This ruling underscores the principle that parties cannot unilaterally decide the nullity of their marriage. Any marriage, even if void or voidable, is presumed valid until a competent court declares otherwise. Therefore, an individual who enters into a second marriage before obtaining a judicial declaration of nullity for the first assumes the risk of being prosecuted for bigamy. The Court also emphasized that criminal culpability attaches upon the commission of the offense and remains until extinguished by law.
The Supreme Court reinforced that the declaration of nullity of the second marriage, even if final, does not erase the fact that the crime of bigamy was committed when the second marriage was contracted. This decision aligns with established jurisprudence and safeguards the institution of marriage by discouraging individuals from entering into multiple marriages without proper legal dissolution of previous ones.
FAQs
| What was the key issue in this case? | The key issue was whether a subsequent declaration of nullity of a second marriage is a valid defense against a charge of bigamy. |
| What is the crime of bigamy? | Bigamy is committed when a person contracts a second marriage while still legally married to another. |
| When is the crime of bigamy considered consummated? | The crime of bigamy is consummated the moment the second marriage is celebrated while the first marriage is still valid. |
| Can a person be charged with bigamy even if their second marriage is declared void? | Yes, a person can be charged with bigamy even if their second marriage is later declared void, because the crime was already committed when the second marriage was contracted. |
| Why did the Supreme Court rule this way? | The Supreme Court ruled this way to prevent individuals from evading bigamy charges by simply seeking annulment of their prior marriage after contracting a second one. |
| What does this ruling mean for people considering a second marriage? | This ruling means that individuals must ensure their first marriage is legally dissolved before entering into a second marriage to avoid being charged with bigamy. |
| Does this ruling affect the validity of the declaration of nullity of the second marriage? | No, the ruling does not affect the validity of the declaration of nullity of the second marriage; it only addresses the criminal liability for bigamy. |
This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal procedures when dissolving a marriage and contracting a new one. It serves as a reminder that the sanctity of marriage is protected by law, and individuals who disregard these laws will be held accountable.
For inquiries regarding the application of this ruling to specific circumstances, please contact Atty. Gabriel Ablola through gaboogle.com or via email at connect@gaboogle.com.
Disclaimer: This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance tailored to your situation, please consult with a qualified attorney.
Source: Capili vs. People, G.R. No. 183805, July 3, 2013
Leave a Reply